We all learn about the human animal bond in vet school and we all experience it in our daily lives ourselves. But, as Dr. Lauren Smith of The Vetitude wrote on her blog this week, we might very well forget about it in our day to day discourse.
Dr. Smith writes and speaks about veterinary medicine on her website and this week’s blog was about considering what it means to perform medical tasks only for an owner’s benefit:
“I have increasingly been seeing a trend towards divorcing the needs and wants of the pet owner from the needs and wants of the pet. I see it in the way so many vets insist on taking animals to the back to put in catheters for euthanasia instead of doing it in the room with the client. I see it in the number of people wishing their practices could stay curbside forever. I see it in veterinary professionals insisting that pets do ‘better in the back, away from their owners.’ And I see it in the concept of ‘pet surrender,’ when a client wants to keep their pet but can’t afford their treatment and so the pet is given to someone else.
We in the veterinary profession are tasked with looking out for a pet’s wellbeing. But so many of us seem to be forgetting about an essential aspect of that wellbeing—the pet’s bond with their person. Are we really doing our patients a favor by discounting the needs of their family?”
Wow. It is great to hear folks challenge the status quo. The only way our profession grows is by challenging and considering our own ideas and biases. The human-animal bond is an important part of what we do. And finding the balance between our professional needs and those of our clients will continue to be a daily challenge.
Responses